top of page

Public Works Minister Escapes $10 Million Villa Question, Cites National Security Implications

  • Writer: Michael T
    Michael T
  • Nov 12
  • 2 min read
L-R: Julius Jeh, Minister Roland Giddings and T-max Jlahteh
L-R : Julius Jeh, Minister Roland Giddings and T-max Jlahteh

Here stands a mansion, allegedly worth $10 million, rising from the bush in President Boakai’s hometown of Foya—guarded by more questions than answers. Ask who owns it: one official claims the Mano River Union, which flatly denies involvement; another says it's “government property,” yet no one can produce a contract, a budget line, or evidence of competitive bidding. Others shy away, citing national security implications. Is it a fear for Accountability or what?


On the “50/50” show, Public Works Minister Roland Giddings sidestepped the Foya villa question, only invoking “national security implications.” Pressed by journalist Julius Jeh, Giddings declared the project outside his oversight, stating neither involvement nor knowledge—a notable retreat from the very office responsible for infrastructure.

This is just the latest act in a string of government contradictions.


Deputy Information Minister Daniel Sando claimed the villa was a Mano River Union venture, only to withdraw his statement when MRU denied it. Presidential Press Secretary Kula Fofana called the structure a government asset for presidential use, but provided no documentation or funding details, promising only to "update the public later."

The superintendent of Lofa County had no knowledge, noting the villa project proceeds without local government input or approval.


The MRU’s categorical denial removed the government’s supposed financier, heightening suspicion as no credible alternative has emerged. Not one official—whether from Public Works, Information, or the presidency—has produced procurement records, contracts, or a transparent budget trail.


In classic corruption, such contradictions and evasions are the red flags. The villa’s scale and secrecy—far beyond President Boakai’s official means—suggest misdirection of resources, influence-peddling, or embezzlement. Not one authority accepts responsibility.

For Liberia, the Foya villa stands as indictment, not mystery; each contradiction sharpens evidence of a government unwilling to face public accountability.


The truth is hidden for one reason: shame. Corruption. Betrayal of trust. Bribery. Unpatriotism. Until proven otherwise, the source of the mansion remains as questionable as the building itself.



_________________________

Get Involved

Do you have additional facts to add to this insight or an opinion you would like to express?


Email Us

 

Comments


bottom of page